Goodall Case Not Going Well

[samsloan]

The Case of Chess Philanthropist and Organizer Mike Goodall is not
going well.

You can look at the case file here:

http://webaccess.sftc.org/Scripts/Magic94/mgrqispi94.dll?APPNAME=IJS&PRGNAME=ROA22&ARGUMENTS=-APTR99273030

On April 21, 2011 The Bank of America sued the Goodall Estate in San
Francisco Probate Court, claiming that the entire Goodall Estate
including the Goodall Mansion located at 461 Peachstone Terrace, San
Rafael California should be donated to a charity, Guide Dogs for the
Blind.

This claim is entirely bogus and utterly without basis. They have not
produced even one document or cited even one case that supports their
claims.

One suspects that they already gave the Goodall money to Guide Dogs
for the Blind and cannot get it back.

Lately they have been claiming that under a statute of limitations it
is too late for the Goodall Estate to challenge the "gift" of the
Goodall Estate to the Guide Dogs.

This claim is unspeakably absurd and ridiculous. As the case file
shows, Mike Goodall has been suing Bank of America over this since
December 21, 1999.

Nevertheless, Bank of America has nine attorneys representing two of
the biggest law firms in San Francisco fighting against me, Sam Sloan,
over this $2.5 million estate.

Now, I just learned from Bowman Liu, Records Clerk in the San
Francisco Superior Court Records Room, that the judge in this case on
October 19, 2012 ordered the case file to be brought up from the
archives warehouse to be ready for the next hearing date, which is
October 29, 2012. This proves what I have long suspected that the San
Francisco judges have been ruling in favor of Bank of America without
even looking at the case file !!!! Had they been looking at the case
file and especially at the documents filed in this case in 1999 and
2000, they would have seen right away that Bank of America has no case
at all and that their claims are utterly without basis.

This is probably the ultimate and most extreme example of corruption
and incompetence in the courts.

Sam Sloan

[samsloan]

Thank you for forwarding this to your buddy, the CFO for Guide Dogs
for the Blind.

Since you have done that, you should do him a further favor by
alerting him to the fact that it is not merely a question that he and
his organization might not get the paltry sum of $2.5 million that he
hopes to get from this court case.

It is more than that because your CFO friend stands to lose his
liberty and to go to prison for his covering up the crime of forgery.

Because we can and will prove that Col. Goodall never signed the
supposed trust and the trust document is a forgery.

Even though it was just an agent of Guide Dogs for the Blind who tried
to get the death bed signature of Col. Goodall and, failing that,
forged his signature to get control of the $2.5 million, we can not
only prove this but also prove that your CFO friend knows that it is a
forgery and for that reason refuses to produce the trust document
thereby preventing us from proving this.

First, it is inconceivable that Col. Goodall, a meticulous and
detailed man, would write his only child out of his estate on his
death bed. It is much more likely that the agent for Guide Dogs for
the Blind who gets commissions and fees for getting the death bed
signature would forge the signature, knowing that Col. Goodall was
hospitalized and at the point of death.

Now, we have recently discovered a power of attorney signed by Col.
Goodall on the same date, which was August 24, 1994, just 17 days
before he died on September 10, 1994.

Here is the known signature of Col. Goodall and his wife Rachel.

Now compare that with the signatures on the supposed trust signed on
the same date:

While they might look similar the handwriting expert we have retained,
who also does this work for the FBI, has blown up the signatures and
looked at them with a microscope and says that there are significant
differences. For example, Col. Kenneth F. Goodall signed the FG in his
name with one sweeping movement, as follows:

Now look at a blowup of the FG of the signature on the supposed trust:

By looking at these signatures along with a dozen other known
signatures of Col. Goodall on checks and the like our forensic
handwriting expert was able to determine that Col. Goodall always
signed the FG with one sweeping movement from left to right and his
pen never left the paper.

On the other hand, the FG on the supposed trust was written with three
strokes of the pen and the top stroke was right to left, not left to
right.

Also, as you can plainly see, the entire supposed signature on the
trust was halting and shaky, not like the fluid signature of a man who
was used to signing his name many times.

All of this is known to your CFO Buddy. Thus, he already knows that he
is using a forged instrument to get the $2.5 million even if he did
not commit the forgery himself.

The bright side of this is that the prison system offers free food,
because that is where your CFO Friend and all of the directors and
officers of Guide Dogs for the Blind will be, in prison, if justice is
ever done on this case.

Sam Sloan
Administrator of the Estate of Mike Goodall


On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:46 AM, ***@dennyconnect.com
<***@dennyconnect.com> wrote:



Sent to my buddy who is CFO for Guide Dogs for the Blind.



Mike

[Your smrat ®]

On Oct 26, 9:19 am, samsloan <***@gmail.com> wrote:

<hose>

Post by samsloan
While they might look similar the handwriting expert we have retained,
who also does this work for the FBI, has blown up the signatures and
looked at them with a microscope

Just curious: why would he have to blow them up and look at them with
a microscope? Was he bad at enlarging or did his microscope suck?

<hose>

Post by samsloan
Also, as you can plainly see, the entire supposed signature on the
trust was halting and shaky, not like the fluid signature of a man who
was used to signing his name many times.

The fluid signature of a man "hospitalized and at the point of death"
"you mean? I'm not a doctor or anything, but aren't people "on their
death beds" more likely to move haltingly and shake a bit? I know that
if I was face to face with the grim reaper I'd be trembling and
possibly soiling myself.

<hose>

[Bill Graham]

Post by Your smrat ®
<hose>

Post by samsloan
While they might look similar the handwriting expert we have
retained, who also does this work for the FBI, has blown up the
signatures and looked at them with a microscope

Just curious: why would he have to blow them up and look at them with
a microscope? Was he bad at enlarging or did his microscope suck?
<hose>

Post by samsloan
Also, as you can plainly see, the entire supposed signature on the
trust was halting and shaky, not like the fluid signature of a man
who was used to signing his name many times.

The fluid signature of a man "hospitalized and at the point of death"
"you mean? I'm not a doctor or anything, but aren't people "on their
death beds" more likely to move haltingly and shake a bit? I know that
if I was face to face with the grim reaper I'd be trembling and
possibly soiling myself.
<hose>

I am 77, and in good health, and yet my signature is halting and shakey. I
have never had a smooth signature. It just isn't my nature to write
smoothly.... A lot of the young people today never learn to write script.
They print anything that they can't do on a computer. I wonder how their
"signatures" look?

[samsloan]

Post by Bill Graham

Post by Your smrat ®
<hose>

Post by samsloan
While they might look similar the handwriting expert we have
retained, who also does this work for the FBI, has blown up the
signatures and looked at them with a microscope

Just curious: why would he have to blow them up and look at them with
a microscope? Was he bad at enlarging or did his microscope suck?
<hose>

Post by samsloan
Also, as you can plainly see, the entire supposed signature on the
trust was halting and shaky, not like the fluid signature of a man
who was used to signing his name many times.

The fluid signature of a man "hospitalized and at the point of death"
"you mean? I'm not a doctor or anything, but aren't people "on their
death beds" more likely to move haltingly and shake a bit? I know that
if I was face to face with the grim reaper I'd be trembling and
possibly soiling myself.
<hose>

I am 77, and in good health, and yet my signature is halting and shakey. I
have never had a smooth signature. It just isn't my nature to write
smoothly.... A lot of the young people today never learn to write script.
They print anything that they can't do on a computer. I wonder how their
"signatures" look?

You fail to understand.

We now have something we did not have before.

All we had before was a FAX sent to Bank of America dated 2008, which
is 14 years after the purported Goodall trust was signed on August 24,
1994.

We had a lot of known signatures of Col. Goodall, but none around the
time of his deathbed signature.

So, we had nothing to compare it too.

However, recently we discovered a known real signature of Col. Goodall
and his wife from the exact time and date and place. Here is that
signature: Loading Image...

Now compare this with the signature on gthe purported trust: Here it
is: Loading Image...

Even though these signatures may look similar, a closer examination
shows vast differences.

Of special interest is the fact that Col. Kenneth F. Goodall always
signed the FG of his signature with one sweeping stroke of the pen.
Here is the real signature: Loading Image...

Now here is the same FG on the purported trust
Loading Image...

As you will see the signature on the purported trust is done with
three strokes of the pen and signed with a different type of pen even
though they were supposedly signed at the same time.

We have retained a handwriting expert and this is the first thing he
noticed.

However, he cannot pronounce it a forgery (even though it obviously is
a forgery) because Bank of America refuses to produce the original
trust document.

But do not worry. I intend to have them all put in jail.

Sam Sloan

[Bill Graham]

Post by Bill Graham

Post by Your smrat ®
<hose>

Post by samsloan
While they might look similar the handwriting expert we have
retained, who also does this work for the FBI, has blown up the
signatures and looked at them with a microscope

Just curious: why would he have to blow them up and look at them with
a microscope? Was he bad at enlarging or did his microscope suck?
<hose>

Post by samsloan
Also, as you can plainly see, the entire supposed signature on the
trust was halting and shaky, not like the fluid signature of a man
who was used to signing his name many times.

The fluid signature of a man "hospitalized and at the point of death"
"you mean? I'm not a doctor or anything, but aren't people "on their
death beds" more likely to move haltingly and shake a bit? I know that
if I was face to face with the grim reaper I'd be trembling and
possibly soiling myself.
<hose>

I am 77, and in good health, and yet my signature is halting and shakey. I
have never had a smooth signature. It just isn't my nature to write
smoothly.... A lot of the young people today never learn to write script.
They print anything that they can't do on a computer. I wonder how their
"signatures" look?

You fail to understand.

We now have something we did not have before.

All we had before was a FAX sent to Bank of America dated 2008, which
is 14 years after the purported Goodall trust was signed on August 24,
1994.

We had a lot of known signatures of Col. Goodall, but none around the
time of his deathbed signature.

So, we had nothing to compare it too.

However, recently we discovered a known real signature of Col. Goodall
and his wife from the exact time and date and place. Here is that
signature: http://www.anusha.com/signature-on-durable-power.jpg

Now compare this with the signature on gthe purported trust: Here it
is: http://www.anusha.com/signature-supposed-on-goodall-trust.jpg

Even though these signatures may look similar, a closer examination
shows vast differences.

Of special interest is the fact that Col. Kenneth F. Goodall always
signed the FG of his signature with one sweeping stroke of the pen.
Here is the real signature:
http://www.anusha.com/FG-signature-on-power-of-attorney.jpg

Now here is the same FG on the purported trust
http://www.anusha.com/FG-signature-on-purported-trust.jpg

As you will see the signature on the purported trust is done with
three strokes of the pen and signed with a different type of pen even
though they were supposedly signed at the same time.

We have retained a handwriting expert and this is the first thing he
noticed.

However, he cannot pronounce it a forgery (even though it obviously is
a forgery) because Bank of America refuses to produce the original
trust document.

But do not worry. I intend to have them all put in jail.

Sam Sloan

Not taking any sides in the above discussion, I would like to say that a
signature is a very poor way to identify any person, just as are bite marks
on the skin of a deceased person. Far too much credence is given to those
who claim to be able to tell forgeries from the real thing in both these
cases. I wonder how many innocent people are rotting away in prison because
of these, "pseudoscience's".

[Peter Sloan]

Sam, face it. Mike wanted to help disabled people, and Judge Busch already denied your claim to evaluate a signature. He also told you the trust has no requirement to present to you anything, not being a party... ever

Face it dad, I can see why you were broke so many years, you got a job here as a trustee for many years with no pay and you never became an attorney so just let it go. What financial gain do you have either way.

[samsloan]

Post by Peter Sloan
Sam, face it. Mike wanted to help disabled people, and Judge Busch already denied your claim to evaluate a signature. He also told you the trust has no requirement to present to you anything, not being a party... ever
Face it dad, I can see why you were broke so many years, you got a job here as a trustee for many years with no pay and you never became an attorney so just let it go. What financial gain do you have either way.

Mike Goodall did not want to help disabled people and he especially
hated Guide Dogs for the Blind for what they have done to him and his
family. If he is looking down from heaven now, he fully approving of
what we are doing to save his estate from these people.

Mike Goodall always referred to Guide Dogs for the Blind as "The Blind
Dogs". You cannot imagine how deeply he hated these people. I am
trying to protect his old friends from not doing far worse things to
them.

[B***@aol.com]

I don't know if Sloan is right or wrong here, but damned if he's not
sympathetic even if he's 100 percent right.

Why does he post all this stuff here?

[samsloan]

The Notice of Appeal was filed yesterday, November 21, 2012.

I filed two notices of appeal, one from the order dated May 15, 2012
and the other from the order dated September 27, 2012.

You can see both notices of appeal here:

http://webaccess.sftc.org/Scripts/Magic94/mgrqispi94.dll?APPNAME=IJS&PRGNAME=ROA22&ARGUMENTS=-APTR99273030

You will also be able to see that it took the judge two months to sign
the September order. The order was submitted to the judge on July 27,
2012 but the judge did not sign it until September 26, 2012.

I would say that this was a deliberate effort to deprive us of the
right to appeal from the May 15, 2012 order. Had the order been signed
and filed promptly our appeal from the earlier would have been
regarded as timely.

Sam Sloan