BLafferty
2015-06-19 17:52:56 UTC
When the USCF and other Polgar defendants, myself included, settled Federal court litigation several years ago in West Texas, because a related criminal case was still open against Polgar's webmaster, Gregory Alexander, Alexander's case was continued until the resolution of his criminal case. That was resolved by a guilty pleas by Alexander to Federal charges. But, what is the current status of the civil Federal district court litigation that, last I checked, is still active but on continuance, against Gregory Alexander? I've raised this question on the USCF member only Issues forum but the moderators there, at the behest of the EB, will not allow discussion of the failure of the EB to proceed with the case and possibly recover money for the USCF.
With the guilty plea entered into by Alexander in Federal District Court in Seattle, it should be rather simple to make a motion for summary judgment in the Texas litigation as to Alexander. Alexander might then cross-claim against Polgar and bring Truong in as a third-party defendant thus opening Polgar/Truong to a possible cross/third-party judgment and possible recovery of some money for the USCF from them through Alexander. Any third year law school student could make this analysis on the basis of the public record from documents filed with the Federal court and available to the public via the Federal PACER system.
So, what has the EB been doing in relation to this open litigation for the past several years? Apparently nothing. They owe the USCF membership an update and explanation.
With the guilty plea entered into by Alexander in Federal District Court in Seattle, it should be rather simple to make a motion for summary judgment in the Texas litigation as to Alexander. Alexander might then cross-claim against Polgar and bring Truong in as a third-party defendant thus opening Polgar/Truong to a possible cross/third-party judgment and possible recovery of some money for the USCF from them through Alexander. Any third year law school student could make this analysis on the basis of the public record from documents filed with the Federal court and available to the public via the Federal PACER system.
So, what has the EB been doing in relation to this open litigation for the past several years? Apparently nothing. They owe the USCF membership an update and explanation.