Discussion:
My Game against Grandmaster Smirin
(too old to reply)
samsloan
2012-07-05 20:04:26 UTC
Permalink
My Game against Grandmaster Smirin

Grandmaster Ilia Smirin has been ranked as high as in the top ten in
the world. By luck of the pairing system, I was pared against him in
the second round of the 2012 World Open today. Here is the game:

[Event "World Open"]
[Site "Philadelphia PA USA"]
[Date "2012.07.05"]
[Round "02"]
[White "Smirin, Ilia"]
[Black "Sloan, Sam"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C40"]
[WhiteElo "2647"]
[BlackElo "1902"]

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f6

[When Grandmaster Smirin saw my second move, first he started
laughing. Then, his face turned beet red. Finally, he went into deep
thought. He was probably realizing that he was not up on the latest
theoretical developments on this important line. He spent about ten
minutes thinking about this position until finally he played.}

3.d4

{He probably realized that it is not possible that I had made a
beginner's blunder. After all, what was I doing playing him on the top
boards if I was a beginner? He must have realized that I had
thoroughly analyzed the complications arising after 3. Nxe5 fxe5 4.
Qh5+. Even a top grandmaster could not feel confident of working out
all the possibilities over the board. So, it made sense for him to
play a developing move instead.}

d5 4.exd5 e4 5.Nfd2 Qxd5 6.Nc3 Qxd4 7.Ncxe4

[At this point I think I have achieved at least equality and possibly
the advantage. I even considered offering him a draw since he is a
much stronger player than I am but he might take it if he felt that
his position was inferior.}

Bf5 8.Qf3 Bxe4 9.Nxe4 Nc6 10.Bb5 O-O-O 11.Bxc6 bxc6 12.O-O Nh6 13.Bxh6
gxh6 14.Rad1 Qe5 15.Rxd8+ Kxd8 16.Nxf6 Bd6 17.Ng4 Qxb2

{This I think was my fatal error. I could have played 17. . . . Qf4
forcing a trade of queens or 17. . . . Qg7. Although I would have been
a pawn down, my more active pieces would have made it difficult for
him to win, I believe.}

18.Nxh6 Rf8 19.Nf7+ Kd7 20.Qf5+ Ke8 21.Nxd6+ cxd6 22.Re1+ 1-0
Taylor Kingston
2012-07-05 20:30:25 UTC
Permalink
Post by samsloan
My Game against Grandmaster Smirin
Grandmaster Ilia Smirin has been ranked as high as in the top ten in
the world. By luck of the pairing system, I was pared against him in
[Event "World Open"]
[Site "Philadelphia PA USA"]
[Date "2012.07.05"]
[Round "02"]
[White "Smirin, Ilia"]
[Black "Sloan, Sam"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C40"]
[WhiteElo "2647"]
[BlackElo "1902"]
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f6
[When Grandmaster Smirin saw my second move, first he started
laughing. Then, his face turned beet red. Finally, he went into deep
thought. He was probably realizing that he was not up on the latest
theoretical developments on this important line. He spent about ten
minutes thinking about this position until finally he played.}
3.d4
{He probably realized that it is not possible that I had made a
beginner's blunder. After all, what was I doing playing him on the top
boards if I was a beginner? He must have realized that I had
thoroughly analyzed the complications arising after 3. Nxe5 fxe5 4.
Qh5+. Even a top grandmaster could not feel confident of working out
all the possibilities over the board. So, it made sense for him to
play a developing move instead.}
d5 4.exd5 e4 5.Nfd2 Qxd5 6.Nc3 Qxd4 7.Ncxe4
[At this point I think I have achieved at least equality and possibly
the advantage. I even considered offering him a draw since he is a
much stronger player than I am but he might take it if he felt that
his position was inferior.}
Bf5 8.Qf3 Bxe4 9.Nxe4 Nc6 10.Bb5 O-O-O 11.Bxc6 bxc6 12.O-O Nh6 13.Bxh6
gxh6 14.Rad1 Qe5 15.Rxd8+ Kxd8 16.Nxf6 Bd6 17.Ng4 Qxb2
{This I think was my fatal error. I could have played 17. . . . Qf4
forcing a trade of queens or 17. . . . Qg7. Although I would have been
a pawn down, my more active pieces would have made it difficult for
him to win, I believe.}
18.Nxh6 Rf8 19.Nf7+ Kd7 20.Qf5+ Ke8 21.Nxd6+ cxd6 22.Re1+ 1-0
Once again, Sam, I challenge you to play your suicidal Damiano
against me in this group, starting from the position after 1.e4 e5
2.Nf3 f6 3.Nxe5 fxe5. Any and all forms of assistance to be allowed —
books, computers, consultation with others, etc. — because the goal is
show the objective truth about this turkey of an opening. How about it?
Andy Walker
2012-07-07 08:58:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by Taylor Kingston
Once again, Sam, I challenge you to play your suicidal Damiano
against me in this group, starting from the position after 1.e4 e5
2.Nf3 f6 3.Nxe5 fxe5. Any and all forms of assistance to be allowed —
books, computers, consultation with others, etc. — because the goal is
show the objective truth about this turkey of an opening. How about it?
While such a game would surely be interesting. I doubt
whether that's a sensible goal. Sam doesn't play this opening
because he thinks it's good [no matter how you slice and dice,
2 ... Nc6, 2 ... Nf6 and 2 ... d6 are clearly better, and 2 ...
d5, 2 ... f5 and 2 ... Qe7 are at least treated more seriously
by the opening books], but because he expects his opponent not
to take him seriously. He expects to know the analysis better
than his opponent, and he hopes that White will over-reach and
go all out for a brilliant but illusory forced mate, leaving
Sam with an easy win. Only Sam knows how often this works.
Perhaps it will even work against the assembled forces of these
groups? After all, if the opening is "suicidal" and a "turkey",
then we really do need to smash it, not just [eg] emerge with
a large positional advantage; and that's not the best frame of
mind in which to approach an "objective" assessment.

Personally, I'm with Smirin on this one. If I find
myself playing someone 743 points lower, or even 100 points
lower, why take the risk of getting into complications that my
opponent has seen before and analysed [however poorly], but
that I haven't? Simpler to get Black out of his book, develop
naturally, and leave the pawn doing no good on f6. Sam may be
able to convince himself that he had the better game by around
move 7, but it was a different story ten moves later. Bread
and butter for GMs playing amateurs.
--
Andy Walker,
Nottingham.
Taylor Kingston
2012-07-07 23:58:06 UTC
Permalink
Andy, if I remember correctly, Sam has said once or twice here that
he actually believes the 3.Nxe5 variation of the Damiano is OK for
Black. Objectively OK, not just "I hope my opponent doesn't know the
refutation" OK. I'd just like to see him try to prove that here.
   Once again, Sam, I challenge you to play your suicidal Damiano
against me in this group, starting from the position after 1.e4 e5
2.Nf3 f6 3.Nxe5 fxe5. Any and all forms of assistance to be allowed —
books, computers, consultation with others, etc. — because the goal is
show the objective truth about this turkey of an opening. How about it?
        While such a game would surely be interesting. I doubt
whether that's a sensible goal.  Sam doesn't play this opening
because he thinks it's good [no matter how you slice and dice,
2 ... Nc6, 2 ... Nf6 and 2 ... d6 are clearly better, and 2 ...
d5, 2 ... f5 and 2 ... Qe7 are at least treated more seriously
by the opening books], but because he expects his opponent not
to take him seriously.  He expects to know the analysis better
than his opponent, and he hopes that White will over-reach and
go all out for a brilliant but illusory forced mate, leaving
Sam with an easy win.  Only Sam knows how often this works.
Perhaps it will even work against the assembled forces of these
groups?  After all, if the opening is "suicidal" and a "turkey",
then we really do need to smash it, not just [eg] emerge with
a large positional advantage;  and that's not the best frame of
mind in which to approach an "objective" assessment.
        Personally, I'm with Smirin on this one.  If I find
myself playing someone 743 points lower, or even 100 points
lower, why take the risk of getting into complications that my
opponent has seen before and analysed [however poorly], but
that I haven't?  Simpler to get Black out of his book, develop
naturally, and leave the pawn doing no good on f6.  Sam may be
able to convince himself that he had the better game by around
move 7, but it was a different story ten moves later.  Bread
and butter for GMs playing amateurs.
--
Andy Walker,
Nottingham.
samsloan
2012-07-08 01:34:42 UTC
Permalink
[Event "World Open"]
[Site "Philadelphia PA USA"]
[Date "2012.07.07"]
[Round "06"]
[White "King, Alexander P."]
[Black "Sloan, Sam"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "E64"]
[WhiteElo "2236"]
[BlackElo "1902"]

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.g3 Bg7 4.Bg2 O-O 5.Nc3 d6 6.Nf3 c5 7.d5 Na6 8.O-O
Nc7 9.e4 Bd7 10.a4 b6 11.Re1 a6 12.e5 Nfe8 13.Bg5 dxe5 14.d6 Nxd6
15.Nxe5 Bxe5 16.Bxa8 Nxa8 17.Rxe5 f6 18.Bxf6 Rxf6 19.Nd5 Rf7 20.Nxe7+
Rxe7 21.Qxd6 Rxe5 22.Qxe5 Bf5 23.a5 bxa5 24.Qxc5 Nc7 25.Qxa5 Qd6
26.Qa3 Qc6 27.Rd1 Ne6 28.f3 Qxc4 29.Qe3 Qc2 30.Rd2 Qc5 31.Kf2 Kf7
32.g4 Bb1 33.Rd7+ Kf6 34.g5+ Qxg5 35.Qc3+ Qe5 36.Rf7+ Kxf7 37.Qxe5 Bd3
38.Ke3 Bb5 39.Qd5 Kf6 40.Qd6 h5 41.Ke4 Bc4 42.Qc6 Bb5 43.Qc3+ Kf7
44.Ke5 Nf8 45.Qb3+ Kg7 46.Qd5 Nd7+ 47.Ke6 Kh6 48.h4 Kh7 49.f4 Nb6
50.Qb7+ Nd7 51.Qxd7+ Bxd7+ 52.Kxd7 Kg7 53.Ke7 a5 54.b3 Kh7 55.Kf7 Kh6
56.Kg8 g5 57.fxg5+ Kg6 58.Kh8 1-0

[Event "World Open"]
[Site "Philadelphia PA USA"]
[Date "2012.07.07"]
[Round "07"]
[White "Sloan, Sam"]
[Black "Chang, Jonathan"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "A00"]
[WhiteElo "1902"]
[BlackElo "1946"]

1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 c6 3.h3 e5 4.Nc3 Bd6 5.d3 Ne7 6.e4 Be6 7.Nf3 O-O 8.Ng5
Nd7 9.Nxe6 fxe6 10.Bg5 Qb6 11.O-O Ng6 12.b3 Rf7 13.exd5 exd5 14.Nxd5
cxd5 15.Bxd5 Raf8 16.Kg2 h6 17.Be3 Bc5 18.Qe2 Nf6 19.Bxf7+ Rxf7 20.c3
Qc6+ 21.Kg3 Bd6 22.f3 Nd5 23.Qd2 e4+ 24.Kg2 exf3+ 25.Kf2 Nxe3 26.Qxe3
Re7 27.Qc1 Re2+ 28.Kg1 Rg2+ 29.Kh1 Rh2+ 30.Kg1 f2# 31.Rxf2 Qh1# 0-1
Taylor Kingston
2012-07-08 02:49:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by samsloan
[Event "World Open"]
[Site "Philadelphia PA USA"]
[Date "2012.07.07"]
[Round "06"]
[White "King, Alexander P."]
[Black "Sloan, Sam"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "E64"]
[WhiteElo "2236"]
[BlackElo "1902"]
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.g3 Bg7 4.Bg2 O-O 5.Nc3 d6 6.Nf3 c5 7.d5 Na6 8.O-O
Nc7 9.e4 Bd7 10.a4 b6 11.Re1 a6 12.e5 Nfe8 13.Bg5 dxe5 14.d6 Nxd6
15.Nxe5 Bxe5 16.Bxa8 Nxa8 17.Rxe5 f6 18.Bxf6 Rxf6 19.Nd5 Rf7 20.Nxe7+
Rxe7 21.Qxd6 Rxe5 22.Qxe5 Bf5 23.a5 bxa5 24.Qxc5 Nc7 25.Qxa5 Qd6
26.Qa3 Qc6 27.Rd1 Ne6 28.f3 Qxc4 29.Qe3 Qc2 30.Rd2 Qc5 31.Kf2 Kf7
32.g4 Bb1 33.Rd7+ Kf6 34.g5+ Qxg5 35.Qc3+ Qe5 36.Rf7+ Kxf7 37.Qxe5 Bd3
38.Ke3 Bb5 39.Qd5 Kf6 40.Qd6 h5 41.Ke4 Bc4 42.Qc6 Bb5 43.Qc3+ Kf7
44.Ke5 Nf8 45.Qb3+ Kg7 46.Qd5 Nd7+ 47.Ke6 Kh6 48.h4 Kh7 49.f4 Nb6
50.Qb7+ Nd7 51.Qxd7+ Bxd7+ 52.Kxd7 Kg7 53.Ke7 a5 54.b3 Kh7 55.Kf7 Kh6
56.Kg8 g5 57.fxg5+ Kg6 58.Kh8 1-0
[Event "World Open"]
[Site "Philadelphia PA USA"]
[Date "2012.07.07"]
[Round "07"]
[White "Sloan, Sam"]
[Black "Chang, Jonathan"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "A00"]
[WhiteElo "1902"]
[BlackElo "1946"]
1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 c6 3.h3 e5 4.Nc3 Bd6 5.d3 Ne7 6.e4 Be6 7.Nf3 O-O 8.Ng5
Nd7 9.Nxe6 fxe6 10.Bg5 Qb6 11.O-O Ng6 12.b3 Rf7 13.exd5 exd5 14.Nxd5
cxd5 15.Bxd5 Raf8 16.Kg2 h6 17.Be3 Bc5 18.Qe2 Nf6 19.Bxf7+ Rxf7 20.c3
Qc6+ 21.Kg3 Bd6 22.f3 Nd5 23.Qd2 e4+ 24.Kg2 exf3+ 25.Kf2 Nxe3 26.Qxe3
Re7 27.Qc1 Re2+ 28.Kg1 Rg2+ 29.Kh1 Rh2+ 30.Kg1 f2# 31.Rxf2 Qh1# 0-1
Ah, Sam, you let us down. 33...Kf6?? in the first game? And 20.c3??
in that second game?? Man, talk about crash-and-burn!
samsloan
2012-07-08 05:35:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by samsloan
[Event "World Open"]
[Site "Philadelphia PA USA"]
[Date "2012.07.07"]
[Round "06"]
[White "King, Alexander P."]
[Black "Sloan, Sam"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "E64"]
[WhiteElo "2236"]
[BlackElo "1902"]
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.g3 Bg7 4.Bg2 O-O 5.Nc3 d6 6.Nf3 c5 7.d5 Na6 8.O-O
Nc7 9.e4 Bd7 10.a4 b6 11.Re1 a6 12.e5 Nfe8 13.Bg5 dxe5 14.d6 Nxd6
15.Nxe5 Bxe5 16.Bxa8 Nxa8 17.Rxe5 f6 18.Bxf6 Rxf6 19.Nd5 Rf7 20.Nxe7+
Rxe7 21.Qxd6 Rxe5 22.Qxe5 Bf5 23.a5 bxa5 24.Qxc5 Nc7 25.Qxa5 Qd6
26.Qa3 Qc6 27.Rd1 Ne6 28.f3 Qxc4 29.Qe3 Qc2 30.Rd2 Qc5 31.Kf2 Kf7
32.g4 Bb1 33.Rd7+ Kf6 34.g5+ Qxg5 35.Qc3+ Qe5 36.Rf7+ Kxf7 37.Qxe5 Bd3
38.Ke3 Bb5 39.Qd5 Kf6 40.Qd6 h5 41.Ke4 Bc4 42.Qc6 Bb5 43.Qc3+ Kf7
44.Ke5 Nf8 45.Qb3+ Kg7 46.Qd5 Nd7+ 47.Ke6 Kh6 48.h4 Kh7 49.f4 Nb6
50.Qb7+ Nd7 51.Qxd7+ Bxd7+ 52.Kxd7 Kg7 53.Ke7 a5 54.b3 Kh7 55.Kf7 Kh6
56.Kg8 g5 57.fxg5+ Kg6 58.Kh8 1-0
[Event "World Open"]
[Site "Philadelphia PA USA"]
[Date "2012.07.07"]
[Round "07"]
[White "Sloan, Sam"]
[Black "Chang, Jonathan"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "A00"]
[WhiteElo "1902"]
[BlackElo "1946"]
1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 c6 3.h3 e5 4.Nc3 Bd6 5.d3 Ne7 6.e4 Be6 7.Nf3 O-O 8.Ng5
Nd7 9.Nxe6 fxe6 10.Bg5 Qb6 11.O-O Ng6 12.b3 Rf7 13.exd5 exd5 14.Nxd5
cxd5 15.Bxd5 Raf8 16.Kg2 h6 17.Be3 Bc5 18.Qe2 Nf6 19.Bxf7+ Rxf7 20.c3
Qc6+ 21.Kg3 Bd6 22.f3 Nd5 23.Qd2 e4+ 24.Kg2 exf3+ 25.Kf2 Nxe3 26.Qxe3
Re7 27.Qc1 Re2+ 28.Kg1 Rg2+ 29.Kh1 Rh2+ 30.Kg1 f2# 31.Rxf2 Qh1# 0-1
  Ah, Sam, you let us down. 33...Kf6?? in the first game? And 20.c3??
in that second game?? Man, talk about crash-and-burn!
[Round "07"]
[White "Sloan, Sam"]
[Black "Chiang, Jonathan"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "A00"]
[WhiteElo "1902"]
[BlackElo "1935"]

1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 c6 3.h3 e5 4.Nc3 Bd6 5.d3 Ne7 6.e4 Be6 7.Nf3 O-O 8.Ng5
Nd7 9.Nxe6 fxe6 10.Bg5 Qb6 11.O-O Ng6 12.b3 Rf7 13.exd5 exd5 14.Nxd5
cxd5 15.Bxd5 Raf8 16.Kg2 h6 17.Be3 Bc5 18.Qe2 Nf6 19.Bxf7+ Rxf7 20.c3
Qc6+ 21.Kg3 Bd6 22.f3 Nd5 23.Qd2 e4+ 24.Kg2
exf3+ 25.Kf2 Nxe3 26.Qxe3 Re7 27.Qc1 Re2+ 28.Kg1 Rg2+ 29.Kh1 Rh2+
30.Kg1 f2# 31.Rxf2 Qh1# 0-1
samsloan
2012-07-08 12:26:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by samsloan
Post by samsloan
[Event "World Open"]
[Site "Philadelphia PA USA"]
[Date "2012.07.07"]
[Round "06"]
[White "King, Alexander P."]
[Black "Sloan, Sam"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "E64"]
[WhiteElo "2236"]
[BlackElo "1902"]
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.g3 Bg7 4.Bg2 O-O 5.Nc3 d6 6.Nf3 c5 7.d5 Na6 8.O-O
Nc7 9.e4 Bd7 10.a4 b6 11.Re1 a6 12.e5 Nfe8 13.Bg5 dxe5 14.d6 Nxd6
15.Nxe5 Bxe5 16.Bxa8 Nxa8 17.Rxe5 f6 18.Bxf6 Rxf6 19.Nd5 Rf7 20.Nxe7+
Rxe7 21.Qxd6 Rxe5 22.Qxe5 Bf5 23.a5 bxa5 24.Qxc5 Nc7 25.Qxa5 Qd6
26.Qa3 Qc6 27.Rd1 Ne6 28.f3 Qxc4 29.Qe3 Qc2 30.Rd2 Qc5 31.Kf2 Kf7
32.g4 Bb1 33.Rd7+ Kf6 34.g5+ Qxg5 35.Qc3+ Qe5 36.Rf7+ Kxf7 37.Qxe5 Bd3
38.Ke3 Bb5 39.Qd5 Kf6 40.Qd6 h5 41.Ke4 Bc4 42.Qc6 Bb5 43.Qc3+ Kf7
44.Ke5 Nf8 45.Qb3+ Kg7 46.Qd5 Nd7+ 47.Ke6 Kh6 48.h4 Kh7 49.f4 Nb6
50.Qb7+ Nd7 51.Qxd7+ Bxd7+ 52.Kxd7 Kg7 53.Ke7 a5 54.b3 Kh7 55.Kf7 Kh6
56.Kg8 g5 57.fxg5+ Kg6 58.Kh8 1-0
[Event "World Open"]
[Site "Philadelphia PA USA"]
[Date "2012.07.07"]
[Round "07"]
[White "Sloan, Sam"]
[Black "Chang, Jonathan"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "A00"]
[WhiteElo "1902"]
[BlackElo "1946"]
1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 c6 3.h3 e5 4.Nc3 Bd6 5.d3 Ne7 6.e4 Be6 7.Nf3 O-O 8.Ng5
Nd7 9.Nxe6 fxe6 10.Bg5 Qb6 11.O-O Ng6 12.b3 Rf7 13.exd5 exd5 14.Nxd5
cxd5 15.Bxd5 Raf8 16.Kg2 h6 17.Be3 Bc5 18.Qe2 Nf6 19.Bxf7+ Rxf7 20.c3
Qc6+ 21.Kg3 Bd6 22.f3 Nd5 23.Qd2 e4+ 24.Kg2 exf3+ 25.Kf2 Nxe3 26.Qxe3
Re7 27.Qc1 Re2+ 28.Kg1 Rg2+ 29.Kh1 Rh2+ 30.Kg1 f2# 31.Rxf2 Qh1# 0-1
  Ah, Sam, you let us down. 33...Kf6?? in the first game? And 20.c3??
in that second game?? Man, talk about crash-and-burn!
[Round "07"]
[White "Sloan, Sam"]
[Black "Chiang, Jonathan"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "A00"]
[WhiteElo "1902"]
[BlackElo "1935"]
1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 c6 3.h3 e5 4.Nc3 Bd6 5.d3 Ne7 6.e4 Be6 7.Nf3 O-O 8.Ng5
Nd7 9.Nxe6 fxe6 10.Bg5 Qb6 11.O-O Ng6 12.b3 Rf7 13.exd5 exd5 14.Nxd5
cxd5 15.Bxd5 Raf8 16.Kg2 h6 17.Be3 Bc5 18.Qe2 Nf6 19.Bxf7+ Rxf7 20.c3
Qc6+ 21.Kg3 Bd6 22.f3 Nd5 23.Qd2 e4+ 24.Kg2
exf3+ 25.Kf2 Nxe3 26.Qxe3 Re7 27.Qc1 Re2+ 28.Kg1 Rg2+ 29.Kh1 Rh2+
30.Kg1 f2# 31.Rxf2 Qh1# 0-1
Since the FIDE Rating of Jonathan Chiang is 1935, I thought I had lost
a ton of rating points to him.

But turns out his USCF rating is 2235, 300 points higher. Before FIDE
gets to my game they will probably rate his more recent results and I
will not lose many rating points. He is a kid and his rating will go
up quickly.

Sam Sloan
samsloan
2012-07-08 05:45:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by samsloan
[Event "World Open"]
[Site "Philadelphia PA USA"]
[Date "2012.07.07"]
[Round "06"]
[White "King, Alexander P."]
[Black "Sloan, Sam"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "E64"]
[WhiteElo "2236"]
[BlackElo "1902"]
1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.g3 Bg7 4.Bg2 O-O 5.Nc3 d6 6.Nf3 c5 7.d5 Na6 8.O-O
Nc7 9.e4 Bd7 10.a4 b6 11.Re1 a6 12.e5 Nfe8 13.Bg5 dxe5 14.d6 Nxd6
15.Nxe5 Bxe5 16.Bxa8 Nxa8 17.Rxe5 f6 18.Bxf6 Rxf6 19.Nd5 Rf7 20.Nxe7+
Rxe7 21.Qxd6 Rxe5 22.Qxe5 Bf5 23.a5 bxa5 24.Qxc5 Nc7 25.Qxa5 Qd6
26.Qa3 Qc6 27.Rd1 Ne6 28.f3 Qxc4 29.Qe3 Qc2 30.Rd2 Qc5 31.Kf2 Kf7
32.g4 Bb1 33.Rd7+ Kf6 34.g5+ Qxg5 35.Qc3+ Qe5 36.Rf7+ Kxf7 37.Qxe5 Bd3
38.Ke3 Bb5 39.Qd5 Kf6 40.Qd6 h5 41.Ke4 Bc4 42.Qc6 Bb5 43.Qc3+ Kf7
44.Ke5 Nf8 45.Qb3+ Kg7 46.Qd5 Nd7+ 47.Ke6 Kh6 48.h4 Kh7 49.f4 Nb6
50.Qb7+ Nd7 51.Qxd7+ Bxd7+ 52.Kxd7 Kg7 53.Ke7 a5 54.b3 Kh7 55.Kf7 Kh6
56.Kg8 g5 57.fxg5+ Kg6 58.Kh8 1-0
[Event "World Open"]
[Site "Philadelphia PA USA"]
[Date "2012.07.07"]
[Round "07"]
[White "Sloan, Sam"]
[Black "Chang, Jonathan"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "A00"]
[WhiteElo "1902"]
[BlackElo "1946"]
1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 c6 3.h3 e5 4.Nc3 Bd6 5.d3 Ne7 6.e4 Be6 7.Nf3 O-O 8.Ng5
Nd7 9.Nxe6 fxe6 10.Bg5 Qb6 11.O-O Ng6 12.b3 Rf7 13.exd5 exd5 14.Nxd5
cxd5 15.Bxd5 Raf8 16.Kg2 h6 17.Be3 Bc5 18.Qe2 Nf6 19.Bxf7+ Rxf7 20.c3
Qc6+ 21.Kg3 Bd6 22.f3 Nd5 23.Qd2 e4+ 24.Kg2 exf3+ 25.Kf2 Nxe3 26.Qxe3
Re7 27.Qc1 Re2+ 28.Kg1 Rg2+ 29.Kh1 Rh2+ 30.Kg1 f2# 31.Rxf2 Qh1# 0-1
  Ah, Sam, you let us down. 33...Kf6?? in the first game? And 20.c3??
in that second game?? Man, talk about crash-and-burn!
I am really mad at myself about the first game. All I had to do was
play the obvious 31. ... QxQch and I think I have the advantage and
could never lose and might win the endgame.

Sam Sloan
Andy Walker
2012-07-08 15:27:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Taylor Kingston
Andy, if I remember correctly, Sam has said once or twice here that
he actually believes the 3.Nxe5 variation of the Damiano is OK for
Black. Objectively OK, not just "I hope my opponent doesn't know the
refutation" OK.
I wouldn't know what Sam has claimed -- there's only so much
I can take about internal USCF politics, etc -- but *that* much may
even be true. After 3 ... Qe7, it's clear that White has the better
game, but if it's not a forced win [and it doesn't look that way to
me] then it's "objectively" a draw, and thus "OK". I wouldn't care
to spend my entire chess career trying to prove it, however; it's
nice to have some fun as Black once in a while. 3 ... fxe5 may be a
different story.
Post by Taylor Kingston
I'd just like to see him try to prove that here.
It would be a lot more chess-related than some of the stuff
posted here, that's for sure.
--
Andy Walker,
Nottingham.
Taylor Kingston
2012-07-08 16:57:01 UTC
Permalink
   Andy, if I remember correctly, Sam has said once or twice here that
he actually believes the 3.Nxe5 variation of the Damiano is OK for
Black. Objectively OK, not just "I hope my opponent doesn't know the
refutation" OK.
        I wouldn't know what Sam has claimed -- there's only so much
I can take about internal USCF politics, etc -- but *that* much may
even be true.  After 3 ... Qe7, it's clear that White has the better
game, but if it's not a forced win [and it doesn't look that way to
me] then it's "objectively" a draw, and thus "OK".
3...Qe7 is definitely better than 3...fxe5. Chigorin drew with it
against Schiffers, and once even Fischer failed to beat it in a simul
(see below). But Sam believes in the 3...fxe5 line, thinking Black
wins a piece. (He does, but just for a few moves.)
Still, 3...Qe7's record in the small sample on my database is poor:
+1 -4 =2. Here are the two draws:

[Event "St Petersburg m"]
[Site "St Petersburg"]
[Date "1897.??.??"]
[Round "13"]
[White "Schiffers, Emanuel Stepanovich"]
[Black "Chigorin, Mikhail"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "C40"]
[PlyCount "68"]
[EventDate "1897.??.??"]
[EventType "match"]
[EventRounds "14"]
[EventCountry "RUS"]
[Source "ChessBase"]
[SourceDate "1998.11.10"]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 f6 3. Nxe5 Qe7 4. Nf3 d5 5. d3 dxe4 6. dxe4 Qxe4+ 7.
Be2 Nc6 8. O-O Bd7 9. Nc3 Qg6 10. Ne5 Nxe5 11. Bh5 O-O-O 12. Bxg6 hxg6
13. Qe2 Bd6 14. Ne4 Nf3+ 15. gxf3 Bxh2+ 16. Kg2 Bh3+ 17. Kh1 Be5 18.
Kg1 Bh2+ 19. Kh1 Be5 20. Qe1 Bg4+ 21. Kg1 Bxf3 22. Ng3 Ne7 23. Qe3 Bc6
24. Qxa7 b6 25. Be3 Nf5 26. f4 Nxg3 27. fxe5 Rh1+ 28. Kf2 Rh2+ 29.
Kxg3 Rdh8 30. Qa6+ Kb8 31. Bxb6 Rg2+ 32. Kf4 Rh4+ 33. Ke3 Rh3+ 34. Kf4
Rh4+ 1/2-1/2

[Event "Houston sim"]
[Site "Houston"]
[Date "1964.??.??"]
[Round "?"]
[White "Fischer, Robert James"]
[Black "McGregor, Robert F"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "C40"]
[PlyCount "52"]
[EventDate "1964.??.??"]
[EventType "simul"]
[EventRounds "1"]
[EventCountry "USA"]
[Source "ChessBase"]
[SourceDate "2000.11.22"]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 f6 3. Nxe5 Qe7 4. Nf3 d5 5. d3 dxe4 6. dxe4 Qxe4+ 7.
Be2 Bf5 8. Nd4 Nc6 9. Nxf5 Qxf5 10. O-O Bd6 11. Bg4 Qb5 12. Nc3 Qc4
13. Be2 Qf7 14. Bb5 O-O-O 15. Qg4+ f5 16. Qh3 Nge7 17. Ne4 h6 18.
Nxd6+ Rxd6 19. Bf4 Rd4 20. Be3
Rb4 21. Bxc6 Nxc6 22. b3 Re4 23. Rfd1 Rd8 24. Rxd8+ Nxd8 25. Rd1 Qe6
26. g3 Rxe3 1/2-1/2
samsloan
2012-07-09 12:36:26 UTC
Permalink
   Andy, if I remember correctly, Sam has said once or twice here that
he actually believes the 3.Nxe5 variation of the Damiano is OK for
Black. Objectively OK, not just "I hope my opponent doesn't know the
refutation" OK.
        I wouldn't know what Sam has claimed -- there's only so much
I can take about internal USCF politics, etc -- but *that* much may
even be true.  After 3 ... Qe7, it's clear that White has the better
game, but if it's not a forced win [and it doesn't look that way to
me] then it's "objectively" a draw, and thus "OK".
  3...Qe7 is definitely better than 3...fxe5. Chigorin drew with it
against Schiffers, and once even Fischer failed to beat it in a simul
(see below). But Sam believes in the 3...fxe5 line, thinking Black
wins a piece. (He does, but just for a few moves.)
[Event "St Petersburg m"]
[Site "St Petersburg"]
[Date "1897.??.??"]
[Round "13"]
[White "Schiffers, Emanuel Stepanovich"]
[Black "Chigorin, Mikhail"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "C40"]
[PlyCount "68"]
[EventDate "1897.??.??"]
[EventType "match"]
[EventRounds "14"]
[EventCountry "RUS"]
[Source "ChessBase"]
[SourceDate "1998.11.10"]
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 f6 3. Nxe5 Qe7 4. Nf3 d5 5. d3 dxe4 6. dxe4 Qxe4+ 7.
Be2 Nc6 8. O-O Bd7 9. Nc3 Qg6 10. Ne5 Nxe5 11. Bh5 O-O-O 12. Bxg6 hxg6
13. Qe2 Bd6 14. Ne4 Nf3+ 15. gxf3 Bxh2+ 16. Kg2 Bh3+ 17. Kh1 Be5 18.
Kg1 Bh2+ 19. Kh1 Be5 20. Qe1 Bg4+ 21. Kg1 Bxf3 22. Ng3 Ne7 23. Qe3 Bc6
24. Qxa7 b6 25. Be3 Nf5 26. f4 Nxg3 27. fxe5 Rh1+ 28. Kf2 Rh2+ 29.
Kxg3 Rdh8 30. Qa6+ Kb8 31. Bxb6 Rg2+ 32. Kf4 Rh4+ 33. Ke3 Rh3+ 34. Kf4
Rh4+ 1/2-1/2
Did you notice that Chigorin as Black missed a forced mate early in
that game?

Go take another look at it.

Sam Sloan
samsloan
2012-07-09 13:02:37 UTC
Permalink
[Event "World Open"]
[Site "Philadelphia PA USA"]
[Date "2012.07.08"]
[Round "08"]
[White "Wettasinha, Vasanta"]
[Black "Sloan, Sam"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C40"]
[WhiteElo "1920"]
[BlackElo "1902"]

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f6 3.Nxe5 fxe5 4.Qh5+ Ke7 5.Qxe5+ Kf7 6.Bc4+ d5 7.Bxd5+
Kg6 8.Qg3+ Qg5 9.Qxc7 Nd7 10.O-O Ngf6 11.Be6 Qe5 12.Bf5+ Kf7 13.Qc4+
Ke8 14.d4 Qa5 15.Qe6+ Kd8 16.Bg5 Be7 17.Qf7 h6 18.Bd2 Qc7 19.Nc3 Nb6
20.Bxc8 Rxc8 21.e5 Ne8 22.Rad1 Rf8 23.Qh5 Qd7 24.d5 Rf5 25.Qe2 Bc5
26.e6 Qe7 27.Nb5 a6 28.d6 Nxd6 29.Nxd6 Bxd6 30.Bb4 Rc6 31.Qe4 Rf6
32.Rxd6+ Rxd6 33.Bxd6 Qxd6 34.Qxb7 Rxe6 35.Qxa6 Ke8 36.Qb5+ Kf7 37.h3
Nd7 38.Qh5+ Kg8 39.Rd1 Qe7 40.Qd5 Nf6 41.Qd2 Kh7 42.c4 Qc5 43.Qc2+ g6
44.a3 Rc6 45.Rc1 Qd4 46.c5 Qe5 47.b4 Nd7 48.Qc4 Qe7 49.Qd5 Rf6 50.c6
Nb6 51.Qd4 Nc8 52.b5 Rd6 53.Qc3 Nb6 54.Re1 Qc7 55.Qc5 Na4 56.Qb4 Nb6
57.a4 Nd5 58.Qc5 Nf4 59.Qe3 Re6 60.Qd2 Rxe1+ 61.Qxe1 Nd5 62.Qe6 Nb6
63.a5 Qf4 64.g3 Qc1+ 65.Kg2 Nc4 66.c7 Ne3+ 67.Qxe3 Qxc7 68.Qb6 Qf7
69.Qc6 h5 70.b6 h4 71.Qc7 Kg7 72.Qxf7+ 1-0

[Event "World Open"]
[Site "Philadelphia PA USA"]
[Date "2012.07.08"]
[Round "09"]
[White "Sloan, Sam"]
[Black "Nieto, Guillermo Lui"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "A00"]
[WhiteElo "1902"]
[BlackElo "1897"]

1.g4 e5 2.d3 d5 3.h3 Bc5 4.Nc3 h6 5.Bg2 Nf6 6.e4 dxe4 7.Nxe4 Nxe4
8.Bxe4 Nd7 9.Ne2 Nf6 10.Bg2 Nd5 11.Ng3 O-O 12.O-O c6 13.Qe2 Re8 14.Bd2
Bd7 15.Rae1 Bb6 16.Qf3 Qf6 17.Qe4 Qh4 18.Nf5 Bxf5 19.Qxf5 Qf6 20.Qe4
Re6 21.Kh2 Nf4 22.Bc3 Nxg2 23.Kxg2 Bd4 24.Bd2
Rae8 25.Kg3 Qe7 26.Kh2 Bxb2 27.Rb1 Bd4 28.f4 Qd7 29.f5 R6e7 30.f6 gxf6
31.Rxf6 Re6 32.Rxh6 Rxh6 33.Bxh6 Qd5 34.Qf5 Qe6 35.Rxb7 Qxf5 36.gxf5
e4 37.Rd7 Bb6 38.dxe4 Rxe4 39.Kg3 Ra4 40.Re7 Rxa2 41.Bf4 Rxc2 42.Be5
Kf8 43.Rb7 Rd2 44.Kg4 Rd8 45.Kg5 Re8 46.Bd6+ Kg8 47.h4 Be3+ 48.Kf6
Bd4+ 49.Kg5 Be3+ 50.Kg4 Rd8 51.Be5 Bd4 52.Bxd4 Rxd4+ 53.Kg5 a5 54.Rc7
Rd6 55.Ra7 c5 56.Rxa5 Rc6 57.Ra3 c4 58.Rc3 Kg7 1/2-1/2
Taylor Kingston
2012-07-10 02:36:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by samsloan
[Event "World Open"]
[Site "Philadelphia PA USA"]
[Date "2012.07.08"]
[Round "08"]
[White "Wettasinha, Vasanta"]
[Black "Sloan, Sam"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C40"]
[WhiteElo "1920"]
[BlackElo "1902"]
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f6 3.Nxe5 fxe5 4.Qh5+ Ke7 5.Qxe5+ Kf7 6.Bc4+ d5 7.Bxd5+
Kg6 8.Qg3+ Qg5 9.Qxc7 Nd7 10.O-O Ngf6 11.Be6 Qe5 12.Bf5+ Kf7 13.Qc4+
Ke8 14.d4 Qa5 15.Qe6+ Kd8 16.Bg5 Be7 17.Qf7 h6 18.Bd2 Qc7 19.Nc3 Nb6
20.Bxc8 Rxc8 21.e5 Ne8 22.Rad1 Rf8 23.Qh5 Qd7 24.d5 Rf5 25.Qe2 Bc5
26.e6 Qe7 27.Nb5 a6 28.d6 Nxd6 29.Nxd6 Bxd6 30.Bb4 Rc6 31.Qe4 Rf6
32.Rxd6+ Rxd6 33.Bxd6 Qxd6 34.Qxb7 Rxe6 35.Qxa6 Ke8 36.Qb5+ Kf7 37.h3
Nd7 38.Qh5+ Kg8 39.Rd1 Qe7 40.Qd5 Nf6 41.Qd2 Kh7 42.c4 Qc5 43.Qc2+ g6
44.a3 Rc6 45.Rc1 Qd4 46.c5 Qe5 47.b4 Nd7 48.Qc4 Qe7 49.Qd5 Rf6 50.c6
Nb6 51.Qd4 Nc8 52.b5 Rd6 53.Qc3 Nb6 54.Re1 Qc7 55.Qc5 Na4 56.Qb4 Nb6
57.a4 Nd5 58.Qc5 Nf4 59.Qe3 Re6 60.Qd2 Rxe1+ 61.Qxe1 Nd5 62.Qe6 Nb6
63.a5 Qf4 64.g3 Qc1+ 65.Kg2 Nc4 66.c7 Ne3+ 67.Qxe3 Qxc7 68.Qb6 Qf7
69.Qc6 h5 70.b6 h4 71.Qc7 Kg7 72.Qxf7+ 1-0
An entertaining effort by both sides. White missed the refutation
(8.h4!) but still found a strong continuation (which yet again shows
how bad the Damiano is) and was clearly winning up until about move
28. Then he (she?) lost the thread, made a further mistake with
32.Rxd6+?!, and from there was in a real battle up to about move 44.
After that White took control again, systematically advancing the
queenside pawns to victory.
Taylor Kingston
2012-07-09 16:16:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by samsloan
   Andy, if I remember correctly, Sam has said once or twice here that
he actually believes the 3.Nxe5 variation of the Damiano is OK for
Black. Objectively OK, not just "I hope my opponent doesn't know the
refutation" OK.
        I wouldn't know what Sam has claimed -- there's only so much
I can take about internal USCF politics, etc -- but *that* much may
even be true.  After 3 ... Qe7, it's clear that White has the better
game, but if it's not a forced win [and it doesn't look that way to
me] then it's "objectively" a draw, and thus "OK".
  3...Qe7 is definitely better than 3...fxe5. Chigorin drew with it
against Schiffers, and once even Fischer failed to beat it in a simul
(see below). But Sam believes in the 3...fxe5 line, thinking Black
wins a piece. (He does, but just for a few moves.)
[Event "St Petersburg m"]
[Site "St Petersburg"]
[Date "1897.??.??"]
[Round "13"]
[White "Schiffers, Emanuel Stepanovich"]
[Black "Chigorin, Mikhail"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "C40"]
[PlyCount "68"]
[EventDate "1897.??.??"]
[EventType "match"]
[EventRounds "14"]
[EventCountry "RUS"]
[Source "ChessBase"]
[SourceDate "1998.11.10"]
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 f6 3. Nxe5 Qe7 4. Nf3 d5 5. d3 dxe4 6. dxe4 Qxe4+ 7.
Be2 Nc6 8. O-O Bd7 9. Nc3 Qg6 10. Ne5 Nxe5 11. Bh5 O-O-O 12. Bxg6 hxg6
13. Qe2 Bd6 14. Ne4 Nf3+ 15. gxf3 Bxh2+ 16. Kg2 Bh3+ 17. Kh1 Be5 18.
Kg1 Bh2+ 19. Kh1 Be5 20. Qe1 Bg4+ 21. Kg1 Bxf3 22. Ng3 Ne7 23. Qe3 Bc6
24. Qxa7 b6 25. Be3 Nf5 26. f4 Nxg3 27. fxe5 Rh1+ 28. Kf2 Rh2+ 29.
Kxg3 Rdh8 30. Qa6+ Kb8 31. Bxb6 Rg2+ 32. Kf4 Rh4+ 33. Ke3 Rh3+ 34. Kf4
Rh4+ 1/2-1/2
Did you notice that Chigorin as Black missed a forced mate early in
that game?
Yes, he had two opportunities to force mate starting with ...Rh8-h1+
at either move 24 or 25, but that was hardly the only blown
opportunity.
This is a strange game — neither player really fathomed all the
complications. Schiffers was winning as early as move 10, when he
sprang a combination that won Black's queen for bishop and knight.
Then he blew it almost immediately with 14.Ne4? (better 14.Bf4) which
allowed Chigorin to force a draw. But Chigorin didn't take the draw;
he kept trying to win but missed his chances. Even after missing the
mate, though, he was still better, and could have clinched with, say,
26...Nxe3 or 26...Bxb2. Instead he gave the advantage back to White
with 26...Nxg3?, and then should have lost after 30...Kb8? 31.Bxb6!.

What I really don't understand is why did Schiffers repeat moves
toward the end to allow a draw? He could still have won with 34.Kd4!
Rd2+ 35.Qd3!. White ends up the exchange and pawn to the good.
samsloan
2012-07-10 17:31:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by samsloan
My Game against Grandmaster Smirin
Grandmaster Ilia Smirin has been ranked as high as in the top ten in
the world. By luck of the pairing system, I was pared against him in
[Event "World Open"]
[Site "Philadelphia PA USA"]
[Date "2012.07.05"]
[Round "02"]
[White "Smirin, Ilia"]
[Black "Sloan, Sam"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C40"]
[WhiteElo "2647"]
[BlackElo "1902"]
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f6
[When Grandmaster Smirin saw my second move, first he started
laughing. Then, his face turned beet red. Finally, he went into deep
thought. He was probably realizing that he was not up on the latest
theoretical developments on this important line. He spent about ten
minutes thinking about this position until finally he played.}
I have posted a picture of my playing my Damiano's Defense against
Grandmaster Smirin on my Facebook page.

http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151112127864155&set=a.426466099154.225138.543069154&type=1&theater

As you can see, his face had turned red as he contemplates his fate.

Sam Sloan
Taylor Kingston
2012-07-10 17:48:05 UTC
Permalink
Post by samsloan
Post by samsloan
My Game against Grandmaster Smirin
Grandmaster Ilia Smirin has been ranked as high as in the top ten in
the world. By luck of the pairing system, I was pared against him in
[Event "World Open"]
[Site "Philadelphia PA USA"]
[Date "2012.07.05"]
[Round "02"]
[White "Smirin, Ilia"]
[Black "Sloan, Sam"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C40"]
[WhiteElo "2647"]
[BlackElo "1902"]
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f6
[When Grandmaster Smirin saw my second move, first he started
laughing. Then, his face turned beet red. Finally, he went into deep
thought. He was probably realizing that he was not up on the latest
theoretical developments on this important line. He spent about ten
minutes thinking about this position until finally he played.}
I have posted a picture of my playing my Damiano's Defense against
Grandmaster Smirin on my Facebook page.
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151112127864155&set=a.426466...
As you can see, his face had turned red as he contemplates his fate.
Sam Sloan
And it looks like yours turned black ...
samsloan
2012-07-10 20:16:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by samsloan
Post by samsloan
My Game against Grandmaster Smirin
Grandmaster Ilia Smirin has been ranked as high as in the top ten in
the world. By luck of the pairing system, I was pared against him in
[Event "World Open"]
[Site "Philadelphia PA USA"]
[Date "2012.07.05"]
[Round "02"]
[White "Smirin, Ilia"]
[Black "Sloan, Sam"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C40"]
[WhiteElo "2647"]
[BlackElo "1902"]
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f6
[When Grandmaster Smirin saw my second move, first he started
laughing. Then, his face turned beet red. Finally, he went into deep
thought. He was probably realizing that he was not up on the latest
theoretical developments on this important line. He spent about ten
minutes thinking about this position until finally he played.}
I have posted a picture of my playing my Damiano's Defense against
Grandmaster Smirin on my Facebook page.
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151112127864155&set=a.426466...
As you can see, his face had turned red as he contemplates his fate.
Sam Sloan
  And it looks like yours turned black ...
That is because we were not allowed to use a flash camera in the
playing hall.

Sam Sloan
Taylor Kingston
2012-07-10 22:19:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by samsloan
Post by samsloan
Post by samsloan
My Game against Grandmaster Smirin
Grandmaster Ilia Smirin has been ranked as high as in the top ten in
the world. By luck of the pairing system, I was pared against him in
[Event "World Open"]
[Site "Philadelphia PA USA"]
[Date "2012.07.05"]
[Round "02"]
[White "Smirin, Ilia"]
[Black "Sloan, Sam"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C40"]
[WhiteElo "2647"]
[BlackElo "1902"]
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f6
[When Grandmaster Smirin saw my second move, first he started
laughing. Then, his face turned beet red. Finally, he went into deep
thought. He was probably realizing that he was not up on the latest
theoretical developments on this important line. He spent about ten
minutes thinking about this position until finally he played.}
I have posted a picture of my playing my Damiano's Defense against
Grandmaster Smirin on my Facebook page.
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151112127864155&set=a.426466...
As you can see, his face had turned red as he contemplates his fate.
Sam Sloan
  And it looks like yours turned black ...
That is because we were not allowed to use a flash camera in the
playing hall.
Sam Sloan
Are you sure it wasn't your aura?
micky
2012-07-12 01:01:29 UTC
Permalink
samsloan wrote:
.
Post by samsloan
I have posted a picture of my playing my Damiano's Defense against
Grandmaster Smirin...
Did he give you permission?...

Otherwise, you should have been booted for distracting behaviour..

.
Post by samsloan
on my Facebook page.
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151112127864155&set=a.426466099154.225138.543069154&type=1&theater
As you can see, his face had turned red as he contemplates his fate.
Sam Sloan
samsloan
2012-07-12 03:47:32 UTC
Permalink
Post by micky
.
Post by samsloan
I have posted a picture of my playing my Damiano's Defense against
Grandmaster Smirin...
Did he give you permission?...
Otherwise, you should have been booted for distracting behaviour..
.
Post by samsloan
on my Facebook page.
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151112127864155&set=a.426466...
As you can see, his face had turned red as he contemplates his fate.
Sam Sloan
Not true. All chess tournaments allow photography, subject to certain
restrictions. In most international tournaments, photographs may only
be taken during the first five minutes of play.

Chess organizers want photography as it increases the popularity of
their events.

Sam Sloan
Taylor Kingston
2012-07-05 22:33:57 UTC
Permalink
Quite a travesty, Sam. I don't mean to be harsh, but this is a
pretty bad game on your part.

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f6??

Loses by force.

3.d4

Good, but best is 3.Nxe5!

3...d5 4.exd5 e4 5.Nfd2 Qxd5 6.Nc3 Qxd4 7.Ncxe4

Best was probably 7.Qh5+! g6 8.Qd5 Nc6 (or 8...Qxd5 9.Nxd5 Kd8
10.Nxe4) 9.Bc4 Qxd5 10.Nxd5 Kd8 11.Nxe4 with an overwhelming
developmental advantage.

7...Bf5 8.Qf3 Bxe4 9.Nxe4 Nc6 10.Bb5 0–0–0?

Beginning a self-mutilation of Black's pawn structure.

11.Bxc6

Of course.

11...bxc6 12.0–0 Nh6? 13.Bxh6 gxh6

Black's position is rubble: every pawn is isolated and/or doubled.

14.Rad1 Qe5 15.Rxd8+ Kxd8 16.Nxf6 Bd6 17.Ng4 Qxb2

Calling this a mistake would be like criticizing a legless man's
dancing.

18.Nxh6 Rf8 19.Nf7+ Kd7 20.Qf5+ Ke8 21.Nxd6+ cxd6 22.Re1+ 1-0
Post by samsloan
My Game against Grandmaster Smirin
Grandmaster Ilia Smirin has been ranked as high as in the top ten in
the world. By luck of the pairing system, I was pared against him in
[Event "World Open"]
[Site "Philadelphia PA USA"]
[Date "2012.07.05"]
[Round "02"]
[White "Smirin, Ilia"]
[Black "Sloan, Sam"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C40"]
[WhiteElo "2647"]
[BlackElo "1902"]
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f6
[When Grandmaster Smirin saw my second move, first he started
laughing. Then, his face turned beet red.
He probably felt deeply embarrassed for you.
Post by samsloan
Finally, he went into deep
thought. He was probably realizing that he was not up on the latest
theoretical developments on this important line.
There are no "latest theoretical developments" in the Damiano, for
two reasons: (1) It was refuted centuries ago, and (2) nobody who's
any good plays it, so there are no new variations to discuss.
Post by samsloan
He spent about ten
minutes thinking about this position until finally he played.}
3.d4
{He probably realized that it is not possible that I had made a
beginner's blunder. After all, what was I doing playing him on the top
boards if I was a beginner? He must have realized that I had
thoroughly analyzed the complications arising after 3. Nxe5 fxe5 4.
Qh5+. Even a top grandmaster could not feel confident of working out
all the possibilities over the board. So, it made sense for him to
play a developing move instead.}
Which just goes to show how bad the Damiano is. Even if White avoids
the direct refutation, he gets a good game with normal developing
moves.
Post by samsloan
d5 4.exd5 e4 5.Nfd2 Qxd5 6.Nc3 Qxd4 7.Ncxe4
[At this point I think I have achieved at least equality and possibly
the advantage.
Nonsense. You are two or three tempi behind in development, and your
kingside structure is compromised.
Post by samsloan
I even considered offering him a draw since he is a
much stronger player than I am but he might take it if he felt that
his position was inferior.}
Bf5 8.Qf3 Bxe4 9.Nxe4 Nc6 10.Bb5 O-O-O 11.Bxc6 bxc6 12.O-O Nh6 13.Bxh6
gxh6 14.Rad1 Qe5 15.Rxd8+ Kxd8 16.Nxf6 Bd6 17.Ng4 Qxb2
{This I think was my fatal error.
No, that was 2...f6?.
Post by samsloan
I could have played 17. . . . Qf4
forcing a trade of queens
White would love to trade queens. He's alread a pawn up (and passed
to boot), and the rest of your pawns are sitting ducks, while his pawn
structure is perfect. The endgame would be a cakewalk for him.
Post by samsloan
or 17. . . . Qg7. Although I would have been
a pawn down, my more active pieces would have made it difficult for
him to win, I believe.}
Sam, what drugs are you on? You are as busted as a guy trying to buy
sex from an undercover cop.
Post by samsloan
18.Nxh6 Rf8 19.Nf7+ Kd7 20.Qf5+ Ke8 21.Nxd6+ cxd6 22.Re1+ 1-0
samsloan
2012-07-06 04:11:21 UTC
Permalink
Here I beat another master with one of my unusual openings:

[Event "World Open"]
[Site "Philadelphia PA USA"]
[Date "2012.07.05"]
[Round "03"]
[White "Sloan, Sam"]
[Black "Santarius, Erik F"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "A00"]
[WhiteElo "1902"]
[BlackElo "2297"]

1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 c6 3.h3 g6 4.Nc3 Bg7 5.d4 Nf6 6.Nf3 O-O 7.Bg5 Nbd7 8.e3
Re8 9.Bf4 Nf8 10.Qd3 N6d7 11.O-O-O f6 12.e4 Nb6 13.e5 Ne6 14.Bg3 a5
15.h4 a4 16.h5 g5 17.h6 Bh8 18.Rhe1 Nf8 19.Nh2 Ng6 20.Re2 fxe5 21.dxe5
e6 22.Be4 Nxe5 23.Bxh7+ Kf7 24.Bxe5 Bxe5 25.Rxe5 Qf6 26.Qf3 Ke7
27.Qxf6+ Kxf6 28.Nf3 Rh8 29.Bd3 Rxh6 30.Rxg5 e5 31.Rxe5 Bxg4 32.Rde1
Nd7 33.R5e3 Nc5 34.Ne5 Be6 35.Rf3+ Ke7 36.Bf5 Bxf5 37.Rxf5 Re6 38.Nf3
Rh8 39.Rxe6+ Kxe6 40.Re5+ Kf6 41.Re1 Rh3 42.Nd2 a3 43.b4 Na6 44.b5 Nb4
45.f3 Rh2 46.Ncb1 Nxa2+ 47.Kd1 cxb5 48.Nxa3 Nc3+ 49.Kc1 Na2+ 50.Kb2
Rxd2 51.Kxa2 b4 52.Nb1 Rxc2+ 53.Kb3 Rf2 54.Re3 d4 55.Rd3 Ke5 56.Nd2
Re2 57.Kxb4 Re1 58.Kc5 b6+ 59.Kxb6 Re3 60.Nc4+ Kf4 61.Rxd4+ 1-0




[Event "World Open"]
[Site "Philadelphia PA USA"]
[Date "2012.07.05"]
[Round "02"]
[White "Smirin, Ilya"]
[Black "Sloan, Sam"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C40"]
[WhiteElo "2647"]
[BlackElo "1902"]

1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f6 3.d4 d5 4.exd5 e4 5.Nfd2 Qxd5 6.Nc3 Qxd4 7.Ncxe4 Bf5
8.Qf3 Bxe4 9.Nxe4 Nc6 10.Bb5 O-O-O 11.Bxc6 bxc6 12.O-O Nh6 13.Bxh6
gxh6 14.Rad1 Qe5 15.Rxd8+ Kxd8 16.Nxf6 Bd6 17.Ng4 Qxb2 18.Nxh6 Rf8
19.Nf7+ Kd7 20.Qf5+ Ke8 21.Nxd6+ cxd6 22.Re1+ 1-0
samsloan
2012-07-06 19:27:24 UTC
Permalink
I am on a roll. Here I drew an International Master in the Forth Round
in an exciting game with pieces hanging all over the place.

In the unlikely event that I could keep this up, I might get a norm
for the International Master title.

I played the entire game using only 15 minutes on my clock, not
counting the 30 second time delaye.

[Round "04"]
[White "Sloan, Sam"]
[Black "Zlotnikov, Mikhail"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "A00"]
[WhiteElo "1902"]
[BlackElo "2279"]

1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 c6 3.h3 e5 4.Nc3 h5 5.d4 e4 6.g5 Bf5 7.Bf4 Ne7 8.h4 Ng6
9.Bg3 Bd6 10.Qd2 Bxg3 11.fxg3 Qd6 12.Kf2 Nd7 13.Nh3 O-O-O 14.e3 f6
15.Ne2 Bxh3 16.Bxh3 fxg5 17.hxg5 Qe7 18.Nf4 Qxg5 19.Ne6 Qf6+ 20.Kg1
Qf3 21.Nxd8 Qxg3+ 22.Qg2 Qxe3+ 23.Kh2 Qf4+ 24.Kg1 Qe3+ 25.Kh2 Nf4
26.Bxd7+ Kxd8 27.Qg5+ Kxd7 28.Qxg7+ Kd6 29.Qe5+ Kd7 30.Qg7+ 1/2-1/2
Post by samsloan
[Event "World Open"]
[Site "Philadelphia PA USA"]
[Date "2012.07.05"]
[Round "03"]
[White "Sloan, Sam"]
[Black "Santarius, Erik F"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "A00"]
[WhiteElo "1902"]
[BlackElo "2297"]
1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 c6 3.h3 g6 4.Nc3 Bg7 5.d4 Nf6 6.Nf3 O-O 7.Bg5 Nbd7 8.e3
Re8 9.Bf4 Nf8 10.Qd3 N6d7 11.O-O-O f6 12.e4 Nb6 13.e5 Ne6 14.Bg3 a5
15.h4 a4 16.h5 g5 17.h6 Bh8 18.Rhe1 Nf8 19.Nh2 Ng6 20.Re2 fxe5 21.dxe5
e6 22.Be4 Nxe5 23.Bxh7+ Kf7 24.Bxe5 Bxe5 25.Rxe5 Qf6 26.Qf3 Ke7
27.Qxf6+ Kxf6 28.Nf3 Rh8 29.Bd3 Rxh6 30.Rxg5 e5 31.Rxe5 Bxg4 32.Rde1
Nd7 33.R5e3 Nc5 34.Ne5 Be6 35.Rf3+ Ke7 36.Bf5 Bxf5 37.Rxf5 Re6 38.Nf3
Rh8 39.Rxe6+ Kxe6 40.Re5+ Kf6 41.Re1 Rh3 42.Nd2 a3 43.b4 Na6 44.b5 Nb4
45.f3 Rh2 46.Ncb1 Nxa2+ 47.Kd1 cxb5 48.Nxa3 Nc3+ 49.Kc1 Na2+ 50.Kb2
Rxd2 51.Kxa2 b4 52.Nb1 Rxc2+ 53.Kb3 Rf2 54.Re3 d4 55.Rd3 Ke5 56.Nd2
Re2 57.Kxb4 Re1 58.Kc5 b6+ 59.Kxb6 Re3 60.Nc4+ Kf4 61.Rxd4+ 1-0
[Event "World Open"]
[Site "Philadelphia PA USA"]
[Date "2012.07.05"]
[Round "02"]
[White "Smirin, Ilya"]
[Black "Sloan, Sam"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C40"]
[WhiteElo "2647"]
[BlackElo "1902"]
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f6 3.d4 d5 4.exd5 e4 5.Nfd2 Qxd5 6.Nc3 Qxd4 7.Ncxe4 Bf5
8.Qf3 Bxe4 9.Nxe4 Nc6 10.Bb5 O-O-O 11.Bxc6 bxc6 12.O-O Nh6 13.Bxh6
gxh6 14.Rad1 Qe5 15.Rxd8+ Kxd8 16.Nxf6 Bd6 17.Ng4 Qxb2 18.Nxh6 Rf8
19.Nf7+ Kd7 20.Qf5+ Ke8 21.Nxd6+ cxd6 22.Re1+ 1-0
Taylor Kingston
2012-07-06 21:20:27 UTC
Permalink
Congratulations on your success in these two games, Sam. In your
game against IM Zlotnikov, it looks like you followed the advice of
Simon Webb in "Chess for Tigers". He advised that when facing a much
higher-rated opponent, you should try to make the game as complicated
as possible, on the premise that even though the opponent can probably
handle complications better, if you make it complicated enough neither
one of you will have any idea what you're doing, and so he may make a
fatal error.

On the subject of Damiano's "Defense" I did a little statistical
research. My database has 142 games that start 1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f6,
dating from 1620 to 2004. White scores an overwhelming +115 -21 =8,
83%. If we add the moves 3.Nxe5 fxe5, the percentage goes up to ***
96% ***, +22 -1 =0.
Just for you, here's the one game Black won:

[Event "Budapest FS11 Elo"]
[Site "Budapest"]
[Date "1999.??.??"]
[Round "8"]
[White "Boros, Daniel"]
[Black "Bordas, Gyula"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "C40"]
[WhiteElo "2080"]
[BlackElo "2110"]
[PlyCount "86"]
[EventDate "1999.11.06"]
[EventType "tourn"]
[EventRounds "11"]
[EventCountry "HUN"]
[Source "ChessBase"]
[SourceDate "2001.11.25"]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 f6 3. Nxe5 fxe5 4. Qh5+ Ke7 5. Qxe5+ Kf7 6. Bc4+ d5 7.
Bxd5+ Kg6 8. f4 h6 9. f5+ Kh7 10. O-O Nf6 11. Bf7 Rg8 12. d3 Bd6 13.
Qc3 Nc6 14. Bf4 Rf8 15. Bg6+ Kh8 16. Nd2 Bb4 17. Qc4 Bxd2 18. Bxd2 Ne5
19. Qb3 Qd4+ 20. Kh1
Neg4 21. h3 Nf2+ 22. Kh2 Qd6+ 23. g3 Qd4 24. Qb4 N6g4+ 25. hxg4 Nxg4+
26. Kh3 Qf6 27. Kg2 Bd7 28. Rae1 Bc6 29. Bc3 Qg5 30. Qd4 Rg8 31. Re2
Rad8 32. Qc5 Rd6 33. Bd2 Qe7 34. Bf4 Rd7 35. Qxa7 Rgd8 36. a3 Nf6 37.
Rfe1 b6 38. Qa6 Rd4 39. Be3 Ra4 40. Bc5 Qxc5 41. b4 Qd4 42. Qc4 Qxc4
43. dxc4 Rd4 0-1
Post by samsloan
I am on a roll. Here I drew an International Master in the Forth Round
in an exciting game with pieces hanging all over the place.
In the unlikely event that I could keep this up, I might get a norm
for the International Master title.
I played the entire game using only 15 minutes on my clock, not
counting the 30 second time delaye.
[Round "04"]
[White "Sloan, Sam"]
[Black "Zlotnikov, Mikhail"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "A00"]
[WhiteElo "1902"]
[BlackElo "2279"]
1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 c6 3.h3 e5 4.Nc3 h5 5.d4 e4 6.g5 Bf5 7.Bf4 Ne7 8.h4 Ng6
9.Bg3 Bd6 10.Qd2 Bxg3 11.fxg3 Qd6 12.Kf2 Nd7 13.Nh3 O-O-O 14.e3 f6
15.Ne2 Bxh3 16.Bxh3 fxg5 17.hxg5 Qe7 18.Nf4 Qxg5 19.Ne6 Qf6+ 20.Kg1
Qf3 21.Nxd8 Qxg3+ 22.Qg2 Qxe3+ 23.Kh2 Qf4+ 24.Kg1 Qe3+ 25.Kh2 Nf4
26.Bxd7+ Kxd8 27.Qg5+ Kxd7 28.Qxg7+ Kd6 29.Qe5+ Kd7 30.Qg7+ 1/2-1/2
Post by samsloan
[Event "World Open"]
[Site "Philadelphia PA USA"]
[Date "2012.07.05"]
[Round "03"]
[White "Sloan, Sam"]
[Black "Santarius, Erik F"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "A00"]
[WhiteElo "1902"]
[BlackElo "2297"]
1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 c6 3.h3 g6 4.Nc3 Bg7 5.d4 Nf6 6.Nf3 O-O 7.Bg5 Nbd7 8.e3
Re8 9.Bf4 Nf8 10.Qd3 N6d7 11.O-O-O f6 12.e4 Nb6 13.e5 Ne6 14.Bg3 a5
15.h4 a4 16.h5 g5 17.h6 Bh8 18.Rhe1 Nf8 19.Nh2 Ng6 20.Re2 fxe5 21.dxe5
e6 22.Be4 Nxe5 23.Bxh7+ Kf7 24.Bxe5 Bxe5 25.Rxe5 Qf6 26.Qf3 Ke7
27.Qxf6+ Kxf6 28.Nf3 Rh8 29.Bd3 Rxh6 30.Rxg5 e5 31.Rxe5 Bxg4 32.Rde1
Nd7 33.R5e3 Nc5 34.Ne5 Be6 35.Rf3+ Ke7 36.Bf5 Bxf5 37.Rxf5 Re6 38.Nf3
Rh8 39.Rxe6+ Kxe6 40.Re5+ Kf6 41.Re1 Rh3 42.Nd2 a3 43.b4 Na6 44.b5 Nb4
45.f3 Rh2 46.Ncb1 Nxa2+ 47.Kd1 cxb5 48.Nxa3 Nc3+ 49.Kc1 Na2+ 50.Kb2
Rxd2 51.Kxa2 b4 52.Nb1 Rxc2+ 53.Kb3 Rf2 54.Re3 d4 55.Rd3 Ke5 56.Nd2
Re2 57.Kxb4 Re1 58.Kc5 b6+ 59.Kxb6 Re3 60.Nc4+ Kf4 61.Rxd4+ 1-0
[Event "World Open"]
[Site "Philadelphia PA USA"]
[Date "2012.07.05"]
[Round "02"]
[White "Smirin, Ilya"]
[Black "Sloan, Sam"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C40"]
[WhiteElo "2647"]
[BlackElo "1902"]
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f6 3.d4 d5 4.exd5 e4 5.Nfd2 Qxd5 6.Nc3 Qxd4 7.Ncxe4 Bf5
8.Qf3 Bxe4 9.Nxe4 Nc6 10.Bb5 O-O-O 11.Bxc6 bxc6 12.O-O Nh6 13.Bxh6
gxh6 14.Rad1 Qe5 15.Rxd8+ Kxd8 16.Nxf6 Bd6 17.Ng4 Qxb2 18.Nxh6 Rf8
19.Nf7+ Kd7 20.Qf5+ Ke8 21.Nxd6+ cxd6 22.Re1+ 1-0
Taylor Kingston
2012-07-06 21:32:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by samsloan
I am on a roll. Here I drew an International Master in the Forth Round
in an exciting game with pieces hanging all over the place.
In the unlikely event that I could keep this up, I might get a norm
for the International Master title.
I played the entire game using only 15 minutes on my clock, not
counting the 30 second time delaye.
[Round "04"]
[White "Sloan, Sam"]
[Black "Zlotnikov, Mikhail"]
[Result "1/2-1/2"]
[ECO "A00"]
[WhiteElo "1902"]
[BlackElo "2279"]
1.g4 d5 2.Bg2 c6 3.h3 e5 4.Nc3 h5 5.d4 e4 6.g5 Bf5 7.Bf4 Ne7 8.h4 Ng6
9.Bg3 Bd6 10.Qd2 Bxg3 11.fxg3 Qd6 12.Kf2 Nd7 13.Nh3 O-O-O 14.e3 f6
15.Ne2 Bxh3 16.Bxh3 fxg5 17.hxg5 Qe7 18.Nf4 Qxg5 19.Ne6 Qf6+ 20.Kg1
Qf3 21.Nxd8 Qxg3+ 22.Qg2 Qxe3+ 23.Kh2 Qf4+ 24.Kg1 Qe3+ 25.Kh2 Nf4
26.Bxd7+ Kxd8 27.Qg5+ Kxd7 28.Qxg7+ Kd6 29.Qe5+ Kd7 30.Qg7+ 1/2-1/2
You're lucky he played 26...Kxd8? instead of 26...Kxd7!, when you're
probably busted: 27.Qxg7+ Kc8! 28.Rhf1 (necessary to prevent 28...Qf2+
etc.) 28...Rxd8 29.Qg3 Qxg3+ 30.Kxg3 Ne2+ 31.Kh4 Nxd4 and Black has
all the winning chances. But that's the complications effect I
mentioned.
samsloan
2012-07-07 05:00:08 UTC
Permalink
[Event "World Open"]
[Site "Philadelphia PA USA"]
[Date "2012.07.06"]
[Round "05"]
[White "Arias Santana, Mauricio"]
[Black "Sloan, Sam"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "D46"]
[WhiteElo "2316"]
[BlackElo "1902"]

1.Nf3 d5 2.d4 Nf6 3.c4 c6 4.Nc3 e6 5.e3 Nbd7 6.Qc2 Bd6 7.Bd3 O-O 8.O-O
Re8 9.e4 dxe4 10.Nxe4 Nxe4 11.Bxe4 Nf6 12.Bd3 Qc7 13.Bg5 h6 14.Bxf6
gxf6 15.c5 Bf8 16.Rfe1 Bg7 17.Nd2 f5 18.Bxf5 Qf4 19.Bh7+ Kh8 20.Re4
Qc7 21.Nf3 Bd7 22.Rh4 Rad8 23.Bd3 f5 24.Re1 Kh7 25.Qc1 Bc8 26.Bc4 Qe7
27.Qf4 Qf6 28.Ne5 Kg8 29.Rh5 Kh7 30.Re3 Re7 31.Rg3 Red7 32.Nxd7 Rxd7
33.Rd3 b5 34.Bb3 a5 35.a3 a4 36.Ba2 Rd8 37.Rhh3 Ba6 38.Rhe3 b4 39.Rxe6
Bxd3 40.Rxf6 Bxf6 41.axb4 Rxd4 42.Qc7+ Bg7 43.h4 Rxb4 44.h5 Re4 45.Qf7
1-0
the really really really REAL SAM SLOAN
2012-09-20 05:29:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by samsloan
My Game against Grandmaster Smirin
Grandmaster Ilia Smirin has been ranked as high as in the top ten in
the world. By luck of the pairing system, I was pared against him in
[Event "World Open"]
[Site "Philadelphia PA USA"]
[Date "2012.07.05"]
[Round "02"]
[White "Smirin, Ilia"]
[Black "Sloan, Sam"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C40"]
[WhiteElo "2647"]
[BlackElo "1902"]
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f6
[When Grandmaster Smirin saw my second move, first he started
laughing. Then, his face turned beet red. Finally, he went into deep
thought. He was probably realizing that he was not up on the latest
theoretical developments on this important line. He spent about ten
minutes thinking about this position until finally he played.}
3.d4
{He probably realized that it is not possible that I had made a
beginner's blunder. After all, what was I doing playing him on the top
boards if I was a beginner? He must have realized that I had
thoroughly analyzed the complications arising after 3. Nxe5 fxe5 4.
Qh5+. Even a top grandmaster could not feel confident of working out
all the possibilities over the board. So, it made sense for him to
play a developing move instead.}
d5 4.exd5 e4 5.Nfd2 Qxd5 6.Nc3 Qxd4 7.Ncxe4
[At this point I think I have achieved at least equality and possibly
the advantage. I even considered offering him a draw since he is a
much stronger player than I am but he might take it if he felt that
his position was inferior.}
Bf5 8.Qf3 Bxe4 9.Nxe4 Nc6 10.Bb5 O-O-O 11.Bxc6 bxc6 12.O-O Nh6 13.Bxh6
gxh6 14.Rad1 Qe5 15.Rxd8+ Kxd8 16.Nxf6 Bd6 17.Ng4 Qxb2
{This I think was my fatal error. I could have played 17. . . . Qf4
forcing a trade of queens or 17. . . . Qg7. Although I would have been
a pawn down, my more active pieces would have made it difficult for
him to win, I believe.}
18.Nxh6 Rf8 19.Nf7+ Kd7 20.Qf5+ Ke8 21.Nxd6+ cxd6 22.Re1+ 1-0
any GM or Class A player can find the refutation over the board. this game is fake.
BB
2012-09-20 05:32:20 UTC
Permalink
Post by samsloan
My Game against Grandmaster Smirin
Grandmaster Ilia Smirin has been ranked as high as in the top ten in
the world. By luck of the pairing system, I was pared against him in
[Event "World Open"]
[Site "Philadelphia PA USA"]
[Date "2012.07.05"]
[Round "02"]
[White "Smirin, Ilia"]
[Black "Sloan, Sam"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C40"]
[WhiteElo "2647"]
[BlackElo "1902"]
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 f6
[When Grandmaster Smirin saw my second move, first he started
laughing. Then, his face turned beet red. Finally, he went into deep
thought. He was probably realizing that he was not up on the latest
theoretical developments on this important line. He spent about ten
minutes thinking about this position until finally he played.}
3.d4
{He probably realized that it is not possible that I had made a
beginner's blunder. After all, what was I doing playing him on the top
boards if I was a beginner? He must have realized that I had
thoroughly analyzed the complications arising after 3. Nxe5 fxe5 4.
Qh5+. Even a top grandmaster could not feel confident of working out
all the possibilities over the board. So, it made sense for him to
play a developing move instead.}
d5 4.exd5 e4 5.Nfd2 Qxd5 6.Nc3 Qxd4 7.Ncxe4
[At this point I think I have achieved at least equality and possibly
the advantage. I even considered offering him a draw since he is a
much stronger player than I am but he might take it if he felt that
his position was inferior.}
Bf5 8.Qf3 Bxe4 9.Nxe4 Nc6 10.Bb5 O-O-O 11.Bxc6 bxc6 12.O-O Nh6 13.Bxh6
gxh6 14.Rad1 Qe5 15.Rxd8+ Kxd8 16.Nxf6 Bd6 17.Ng4 Qxb2
{This I think was my fatal error. I could have played 17. . . . Qf4
forcing a trade of queens or 17. . . . Qg7. Although I would have been
a pawn down, my more active pieces would have made it difficult for
him to win, I believe.}
18.Nxh6 Rf8 19.Nf7+ Kd7 20.Qf5+ Ke8 21.Nxd6+ cxd6 22.Re1+ 1-0
and if that game is real, the guy in the picture is obviously not sam sloan. not only have i met him but he doesnt even look like he does in his profile picture.
Loading...